Most job sites index by title, location, or salary. Almost none let you filter by the applicant-tracking system a company runs on, even though that’s one of the most useful signals there is. Greenhouse and Lever skew toward funded, scaling startups; Ashby skews earlier-stage and eng-heavy; Workable and Recruitee show up across a broader, often smaller set of employers. If you know the ATS, you know a lot about who you’re applying to.
Where each role is posted
| Role | Roles tracked | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable | Ashby | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software Engineers | 1,640 | 55% | 12% | 0% | 34% | |
| Account Executives | 788 | 76% | 5% | 0% | 18% | 1% |
| Product Managers | 497 | 65% | 9% | 26% | 0% | |
| Operations | 470 | 61% | 9% | 0% | 27% | 3% |
| Engineering Managers | 281 | 66% | 11% | 22% | 0% | |
| Machine Learning Engineers | 280 | 55% | 13% | 32% | 1% | |
| Account Managers | 275 | 60% | 10% | 29% | 1% | |
| Solutions Engineers | 270 | 64% | 6% | 0% | 30% | |
| Forward Deployed Engineers | 247 | 23% | 31% | 45% | 0% | |
| Security Engineers | 234 | 47% | 10% | 43% | 0% | |
| Sales Development Reps | 234 | 63% | 12% | 0% | 24% | 1% |
| Solutions Architects | 225 | 76% | 2% | 21% | 0% |
Browse the underlying companies on any of our ATS-by-role indexes.
Why we publish this
We think the most useful job data is the data nobody else organizes. This is one of those cuts. It’s computed directly from companies’ own career pages (see our methodology for exactly how), and we refresh it as the catalog grows.